Imagine having a form of windows that would run on the first versions of the P4 Intel Chip or on a Celeron, or the newer EEE’s and Ultraportables, wouldn’t that be a greener proposition than having to send tons upon tons of old computers to the recycling center (chips, computer chips are one of the most polluting products on earth due to the strict environment controls and exotic materials that are used in making them. The bad thing is that they’re so well made, recycling them to recover the precious metals can only be done through incineration to vaporize most of the packaging just to get to that precious couple of milligrams of silicon, lead or gold (plus many other exotic stuff they now use on these microprocessors).
Microsoft might still have it’s place in one of the most used Operating Systems but it’s time surely is numbered if they fail to follow suit on the open-system bandwagon which can have a basic web-server running on an old Pentium systems up and running in no time. Vista’s a flop (no doubt about it) and the announcement of a new OS from the software giant has put off more from shifting (even with the announcement of the mandatory phase-out of the selling of new machines bundled with XP). The genius of Bill might be needed (even though he has left the helm of the company again to come up with some concoction that would maintain the company’s grip on the industry it has so benefited from. “You see that light flashing in the corner of your eye? That’s your retirement light, and it’s flashing a bit faster every day)!!”

Many have been saying that time will come when the grip of Microsoft’s Windows on the market would be threatened by its own weight, the time is now. Gone is the time of the one size fit’s all philosophy and this is evident in their introduction from XP to Vista which not many prefer. The main reason, reliability of XP that has evolved since it was first introduced way back 2003. The OS has become so stable that it took the place of Windows 98′ as the preferred OS with all the right stuff in one neat package. That monopoly which has been held by the market is based on a one product fits all (through trim down versions and other editions such as the Media Center from 2005 which capitalized on the area of multimedia) This goes for all applications, from the home desktop, office laptop and desktops to server OS systems that are now feeling the crunch as people shift to more open-systems such as Ubuntu and Linux.
Why shift from a stable system developed by the industry’s largest and best developer, well, first they’re not the best anymore for the open-systems have gained ground allowing older PC’s to work at par as the latest multi-core driven computer systems. These alternate Operating Systems are developed and maintained by a group of industry experts and all users get to voice their needs and initiate changes according to relevance. The control Windows had with all the support and software updates coming from one big global company which sometimes doesn’t get what the user really wants (well, mostly really) has fed up most of us. Useless updates that make old systems slower, excessive overhead (in terms of disk space, memory and processor needs) and the notion that software drives the hardware development industry hand in hand rather than the hardware doing the same.